Governance

The process and roles below are designed to support collaborative and data-driven governance. This framework defines clear decision boundaries and requirements to ensure all campus and district stakeholders are effectively engaged.

Executive Sponsor
Chancellor Rosie Rimando-Chareunsap

Responsibilities:

  • Strategic direction
  • Executive sponsorship
  • Major decision approvals
  • Portfolio prioritization
  • Board engagement
  • Strategic direction
  • Executive decisions
  • Board communications
  • Enterprise accountability

Executive Lead
Brent Jones, Executive Advisor to the Chancellor for Enterprise Strategy & Transformation

Responsibilities:

  • Overall initiative leadership
  • Governance design
  • Portfolio management
  • Executive reporting
  • Risk management
  • Change management oversight
  • Benefits realization oversight
  • Steering Committee facilitation

Executive Steering Committee
Chancellor's Executive Cabinet

Responsibilities:

  • Enterprise prioritization
  • Decision recommendations
  • Executive decision support
  • Resource alignment
  • Risk review and management
  • Progress review and Strategic oversight
  • Governance

Presidents Council
College Presidents: Vice Chancellors of AS/ Instruction/ SS)
Role: Primary operating sponsors

Responsibilities

  • Approve priorities
  • Confirm resource commitments
  • Resolve cross-college issues
  • Support implementation
  • Champion institutional alignment

District-Wide Leadership Team (DWLT)

Responsibilities:

  • Cross-functional review
  • Operational alignment
  • Dependency management
  • Implementation coordination
  • Recommendation development
  • Progress updates
  • Engagement
  • Communications
  • Feedback
  • Shared ownership

Functional Working Teams

Workstreams

  • Enrollment & Onboarding
  • Student Services & Success
  • Academic Pathways
  • Technology & Systems
  • Organizational Alignment
  • Fiscal Sustainability
  • Communications & Change Management
  • Metrics & Continuous Improvement

Responsibilities

  • Analysis
  • Recommendations
  • Design
  • Pilot implementation

This framework clarifies institutional decision rights by defining who executes the work, who holds final authority, and who must be enegaged throughout the governance process. 

Responsible (R)

  • Working Teams: responsible for data analysis and drafting decision package recommendations. 

Accountable (A)

  • Chancellor: Holds ultimate decision-making authority and final approval sign-off for all strategic packages. 
  • Executive Advisor: Facilitates compliance, workflow adherence, and integrity of overall governance process.

Consulted (C)

  • College Cabinets/Executive Leadership Teams (ELTs): Provide institutional impact reviews and campus-specific feedback. 
  • Districtwide Leadership Team (DLT): Conducts cross-functional enterprise reviews to ensure system-wide alignment. 
  • Chancellor's Executive Cabinet (CEC): Evaluates portfolio prioritization and provides formal recommendations, prioritization and endorsements. 

Informed (I)

  • Seattle Colleges Community: kept updated on approved changes, project progress, and institutional impacts. 
  • Board of Trustees: Receive formal updates and final briefings on strategic outcomes and cabinet recommendations. 

To maintain organizational momentum and transparent oversight, decision-making authority and issue resolutions are distributed across four distinct institutional tiers: 

  • Operational issues resolved at sponsor level
  • Cross-college issues resolved through Districtwide Leadership Team
  • Enterprise tradeoffs reviewed by Cabinet (CEC)
  • Strategic direction and major organizational decisions reserved for Chancellor

Recommendations are evaluated, governed, and approved through the following process.

  1. Develop Recommendations: Working Teams prepare recommendations and decision packages.
  2. Assess Local Impacts: College President Cabinets and Executive Leadership Teams (ELTs) evaluate impacts at the campus level.
  3. Conduct Enterprise Review: The Districtwide Leadership Team aligns cross-college interests and conducts a district-level/enterprise review.
  4. Executive Check: The Chancellor's Cabinet serves as Executive Steering Committee responsible for strategic oversight, prioritization, financial stewardship, risk review, implementation readiness, and endorsement of recommendations.
  5. Final Approval: The chancellor makes the final decision. 

The elements below are required in each decision-making package.

  • Executive Summary: High-level overview of the proposal. 
  • Problem Statement: The core issue or opportunity being addressed. 
  • Current-State Assessment: The existing baseline situation. 
  • Options Analysis: Evaluated alternatives and choices. 
  • Stakeholder Feedback: Perspectives and inputs from key groups. 
  • Organizational Impact Assessment: How this affects people, processes, and systems. 
  • Financial Analysis: Budget, ROI, and cost breakdowns. 
  • Governance & Decision Rights: Accountability and approval structures.
  • Risk Assessment: Potential risks and mitigation strategies. 
  • Implementation Readiness: Timeline, resources, and phased deployment plans. 
  • Success Measures: KPIs and metrics to track outcomes.